IT-TT-Report-2003
February 2004
Technology Transfer in the
IT Department
Report for the year 2003
|
IT-TT-Report-2003 F. Fluckiger Version 2 February 2004 |
The objective of this report is twofold:
a) To present the main channels
through which the Department implements CERN 's technology
transfer policy
b) To provide an exhaustive
compilation of IT activities and achievements that have contributed
to technology transfer in 2003
Table of content
2.1 Background
on Technology Transfer at CERN
2.2 Technology
Transfer structures at CERN
2.3 Role
of IT Department in Technology Transfer
3 Scope of TT actions in IT
Department
4 TT activities and achievements in
IT Department in 2003
4.1 Liaison
with, contribution to CERN TT structure
4.2 Technology
Transfer through software licensing in IT
4.3 Technology
Transfer through European Union collaborative projects
4.4 Technology
Transfer through R&D projects with industry
4.5 Technology
Transfer through education, outreach and dissemination activities
5.1 Members
of the Technology Transfer Advisory Board (TAB) in 2003
5.3 Making
IT software available to third parties.
5.4 Definition
of TT terms as used at CERN
5.5 Major
existing Open Source Public Licences
5.7 Organizations
having downloaded the Printing Package.
5.8 Some
facts and figures on the CERN School of Computing 2003
5.9 Science
and Information Society Forum
5.10 Taxonomy
of departmental activities involving external collaborations
5.11 Inventory
of external collaborative activities with Public Institutions in 2003
The objective of Technology Transfer (TT)
at CERN is “to make
known and available to third parties under agreed conditions, technical developments achieved in fulfilling the
laboratory's mission in fundamental research”. The IT Department contributes to this objective by
the transfer of technology, expertise and know-how to industry, universities,
public institutions and the society at large.
IT Department activities focus on fast
changing Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs), which often require
that the necessary developments are conducted in collaboration with external
partners. As a result, the main channels
for TT in the Department are collaborations
and partnering with external
organizations, rather than the classical patenting and licensing approach. The other main channel for TT is the transfer
of software technologies via collaboration
agreements or, more frequently, via open
source mechanisms.
In IT, collaborations and partnering bring
direct additional funding (from funding agencies such as EC-funded projects, as
well as funding from industry such as the openlab). The open-source approach for software also
brings direct benefits by sharing and lowering the cost of development and testing,
as well as bringing indirect longer term benefits, as exemplified by the
World-Wide Web.
Technology Transfer
through Software Licensing
In 2003, a study was undertaken within the Department to review existing practices in terms of software licensing, to compare licensing via bilateral agreements to that based on open source principles, and to evaluate the various options for open source licensing (e.g. GPL, LGPL, …).
Bilateral Collaboration Agreements may be appropriate for only software developed within CERN. Open source is appropriate in many cases, including, but not only, software developed in collaboration with external partners. In 2003, two new software packages were made available as open source (Print Server Software and SLIC), one new bilateral Collaboration Agreement was signed (Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research) and a number of new organizations downloaded the Printing Client Package (programs in binary-only format).
Technology Transfer
through R&D collaborations with industry
The openlab for DataGrid Applications - a framework for evaluating and integrating cutting-edge technologies or services in partnership with industry - is the main vehicle for IT Department R&D partnering with industry. In 2003, two new partners (IBM and Oracle) were successful incorporated, bringing to the number of sponsors to five (together with Enterasys, HP and Intel).
The IT Department hosted two meetings of the
First Tuesday Suisse Romande series at CERN.
Technology Transfer
through European Union collaborative projects
The
European DataGrid (EDG) and DataTag, both EC-funded projects, were, in 2003,
the major examples of TT through publicly funded projects. The European Grid Industry and Research Forum
(IRF) -a framework initiated by the European DataGrid project and joined by the
CrossGrid project- is the focal point of
contact between research on Grid technologies and the industrial and scientific
world. At the end of 2003, the IRF
counted 287 members. 2003 was also the key year for the preparation and
successful submission of the EGEE (Enabling Grid for eScience in
Technology Transfer
through education, outreach and dissemination
CERN
organizes the CERN School of Computing (CSC) every year. The 26th CSC took place in Krems an
der Donau,
The IT department (via the EDG and EGEE projects) was also
one of the founding members and is still a major contributor to the
IT was the originator of the RSIS (Role of Science in the Information Society) conference held at CERN in December 2003. IT contributions included the responsibility for organizing the projects into work packages and that of designing and implementing the SIS-forum, an exhibition organized at Palexpo in the framework of the World Summit on Information Society (WSIS). The organization included 32 people from four divisions (ETT, EP, IT, HR). After a Call for Content, 42 projects from 32 organizations world-wide were selected. The culminating event was the inauguration in the presence of Mr. Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary General. The SIS-forum Web site (http://cern.ch/sis-forum) received more than half a million visits during the month following the event.
Internal activities
The IT DTTO contributed to the work of the Technology Transfer Advisory Board (TAB). Within IT,
an inventory of external collaborations was carried out and the results
presented via a taxonomy of activities. A
web site presenting TT in the IT Department was created.
In 1999, CERN
Delegations approved a new, more pro-active Technology Transfer (TT) policy,
mainly focusing on protection and active transfer of CERN Technology to
A management and coordination structure was set up, including the appointment of a Director in charge of Technology Transfer, the creation of a CERN-wide advisory body (the TAB, TT Advisory Board), the setting up of a network of contacts in every Member State (called the External TT Network), the creation of the Departmental TT Officer (DTTO) function (collectively forming what is called the Internal TT network) and the establishment of a TT group. A paper on Technology Transfer progress and plans is presented every year to the CERN Finance Committee, usually at the March meeting.
The following describes briefly the structures in place in 2003.
Technology
Transfer Advisory Board (TAB)
The TAB advises the CERN Director General for all matters relating to TT. This includes providing recommendations on policies as well as on specific cases (called TT Cases). For the former, the TAB prepares policy documents, proposes procedures and workflows. For the latter, the TAB conducts regular analysis of cases as well as hearings of case proponents. See Appendix 1 for the list of TAB members in 2003.
Departmental
Technology Transfer Officers (DTTO)
The DTTO is the focal point for Technology Transfer matters within the Department and for liaison with CERN-wide TT structures. He/she acts as a facilitator, adviser, promoter, monitor and external liaison person for technology transfer. The scope of his/her mission includes transfer towards all potential socio-economic and cultural third parties.
See Appendix 2 for the full mandate of DTTOs (in draft form at the time of writing).
Technology
Transfer Group (part of ETT division in 2003)
The TT Group's mandate is to implement the new TT policy through the evaluation, protection and valorisation of CERN Intellectual Property (IP). Its activities are focussed on patenting and licensing.
In all structures aiming at strengthening and encouraging Technology Transfer, the Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) play a key role, in particular due to the short cycles in the chain research -> development -> products and services. At CERN, the IT Department is heavily involved in technology transfer, capitalizing on past actions (such as the invention of the World-Wide Web in the former CN Division, the pioneering role in the European Internet infrastructure, the invention of computer intensive solutions like SHIFT) and current involvement in cutting edge technologies such as GRID.
Before the function of DTTO was extended to all CERN Divisions, it was first prototyped in IT Division (in the person of F.Gagliardi). The present IT DTTO (F.Fluckiger) is a member of the TAB, representing the ICT field in the Advisory Board.
The objective of Technology
Transfer has been defined by CERN as follows:
"To make known and available to third parties
under agreed conditions, technical developments achieved in fulfilling the
laboratory's mission in fundamental research."
The scope of TT actions covers technology transfer at large, that is, activities related to the transfer or exchange of expertise, knowledge, ideas and concepts with all socio-economic and cultural third parties. This includes:
a) Industry
b) the Academic world
c) other Public Institutions.
Items a) and c) include collaboration agreements with industrial or institutional partners. Item c) includes International Organizations, the European Commission, Governments, Trade and Industry Departments or Ministries.
IT Department contributed to the TT objective of CERN - as defined in section 3 - through the following activities.
The TAB met 15 times in 2003. The IT DTTO participated in the evaluation of TT cases, contributed to the review of the TT report 2003 to the Finance Committee, and to the work leading to the formation of the Internal Network of DTTOs and the procedures for dealing with TT cases.
The TT group maintains a database of TT projects and activities. A major review of the projects and activities connected to the IT Department and listed in the TT database took place in 2003. A number of outdated information was updated or removed. During this exercise it appeared that the purpose, the classification of items, as well as the user interface to the database needed improvement and clarification. The procedures and respective roles for maintaining the TT database in the future need to be clarified and specified by the TT group, so that the associated workload on the DTTOs remains reasonable.
The production of software, in the field of experimental physics and in support of computer services is a part of the IT Department activities. In 2003, a study was undertaken within the Department to:
The results of the study (which gave rise to a presentation within the Department) are summarized below.
·
“Internal” and “External” software
Software developed by the IT Department may be divided into “Internal” (software available only within CERN) and "External" software (made available, in some way, and under certain conditions, to third parties - sometimes also called “published” software.
·
Form: Binary-only and Source
Software made available to external bodies by the IT Department is either in binary-only form or in source form.
·
Mode: Bilateral Collaboration Agreements
Both binary-only and source programs can be made available through Bilateral Agreement (known at CERN as “Collaboration Agreements”).
The IT Department uses this mode is several specific cases.
·
Mode: Source code made available as “open
source”
The most frequent way for IT to make software available to external bodies is based on Open Source principles (also called “Free Software” principles). Under these principles, binary versions are also made available for selected environments
·
Mode: Binary-only code made publicly available
In several specific cases, IT binary code is made also made available to third parties, through binary download mechanisms.
These forms and modes are presented in a flow-chart in Appendix 3.
Decisions to keep IT software either internal or to have it published, and if so, under which mode, are made on a case-by-case basis. The nature and style of development of the software are key parameters in this decision.
Features |
Bilateral
Agreements |
Publicly
Available Source |
Main Development
style |
Software developed mainly within CERN |
Software developed in a collaborative manner with external partners |
Motivations
for external release |
· Good
relationships with external party · Notoriety · Improvements
available to CERN |
· Benefits
expected from external licensees: testing, improvements · Notoriety · Maximize number of
beneficiaries |
Scaling |
Does not scale |
Scales well |
When discussing forms of software publishing, a frequent mistake, including within CERN, is to confuse public domain (which implies relinquishing IPR) and free software or open source mode where IPRs are retained.
When IT publishes software, it always uses modes where IPRs are retained, i.e. maintaining a CERN copyright statement in the software (see below). By so doing, CERN protects the rights of the outside users, in particular by preventing third parties to turn free software into proprietary software and thus deny the users the right to freely use the material.
Appendix 4 contains a list of terms and their definition as used at CERN regarding IPR and more generally Technology Transfer.
The study has identified three components of what we called “Software Statements” which appear in published software, and have three very distinct functions. At CERN, these three components are sometimes mixed up and confused when software is published.
The study proposed that in the future CERN considers separately these three necessary components, and adopts the terminology below in order the reduce confusion. They are:
1.
Intellectual Property
Statement
Also called Copyright Statement, it specifies who
owns the copyright
2.
Distribution Conditions
Also called "Distribution License", they
specify what are the rights and obligations of those who receive the software.
3.
Disclaimer
It specifies the liability and warranty
conditions.
Components
2) and 3) are often covered by what is called Publicly Available Licenses
or Open Source Licences.
Dozens of models of Open Source licenses have been developed by multiple sources (universities and academia such as the MIT; industry such as Sun, AOL or Trolltech; not-for-profit organizations such as the Free Software Foundation) and are made publicly available for use by organizations wishing to publish their software, whilst retaining the IPR. Appendix 5 gives a few typical examples of open source licenses.
The GPL and LGPL licenses developed by the Free Software Foundation (as well as variants of LGPL adapted by CERN to meet special requirements) are the most frequent open source licenses used by IT to publish source software. Choice of public license or a version adapted for CERN is done after agreement by the CERN legal service.
Appendix 6 provides the list of IT software packages made available in one form or another to third parties at the end of 2003. It also contains the usual conditions which appear in CERN IT Bilateral Agreements.
In 2003, new packages were released and additional bilateral agreements were signed for existing external packages.
New cases in 2003 |
Software Package |
Mode |
Detail |
New external packages |
SLIC |
Open Source |
GPL |
CERN Print Server Software |
Open Source |
GPL |
|
New users of existing external packages |
Nice 2000 |
Bilateral Collaboration Agreement |
Agreement with Friedrich Miescher Institute for
Biomedical Research |
Printing package (Client) |
Public Availability of Binary-only code |
Eighty new organizations have downloaded the package
after agreeing on CERN conditions. The list is available in Appendix 7. |
ICT projects funded by public institutions constitute a major channel for CERN to effectively transfer know-how and expertise, in particular in the field of very large scale computing. In IT, this was exemplified in 2003 by European Union funded projects under the FP5 programme:
The objective of EDG, the European DataGrid project funded by European Union, was to build the next generation of computing infrastructure providing intensive computation and analysis of shared large-scale databases, from hundreds of TeraBytes to PetaBytes, across widely distributed scientific communities. The three year project was successfully terminated at the end of 2003.
The DataTAG
project objective is to create a large-scale intercontinental Grid testbed that
focuses upon advanced networking issues and interoperability between these
intercontinental Grid domains. The results are disseminated into each of the
associated Grid projects. The project
ends in 2004. It involves five academic
partners in Europe, six in North America as well as a number of collaborating
networks and institutes on both sides of the
2003 was
also the key year for the preparation and successful submission of the EGEE
(Enabling Grid for eScience in
In March 2001, an Industry and Research Forum (IRF) was created in the framework of the DataGrid project, as a result of the merging between the Industry and Research fora of two large European Grid projects (DataGrid and CrossGrid). Since then, a number of IRF events have been held in conjunction with the DataGrid conferences.
One of the main objectives of the European Grid Projects is to transfer the Grid know-how to the industrial environment.
The
European Grid Industry and Research Forum is the main point of contact between
research on Grid technologies and the industrial and scientific world. The free subscription to the European Grid
Industry and Research Forum enables researchers, countries and parties, which
otherwise would have difficulties in joining an EU consortium, to receive
newsletters, to participate in interesting discussions, to be invited to major
Grid events and live demonstrations.
In the field of ICT, R&D projects with industry constitute an important channel for transferring CERN know-how, in particular when industry contributes advanced technologies and CERN brings its integrator expertise in building and exploiting large scale systems based on these technologies.
In IT, R&D with industry is exemplified by the openlab for DataGrid Applications, a framework for evaluating and integrating cutting-edge technologies or services in partnership with industry, focusing on potential solutions for the LHC Computing Grid (LCG). The openlab invites members of industry to join and contribute systems, resources or services, and to carry out with CERN large-scale highly-performing evaluations of their solutions in an advanced integrated environment.
In a nutshell, the major achievements in 2003 were: the successful incorporation of two new partners: IBM and Oracle; the consolidation and expansion of the opencluster, a powerful compute and storage farm; the start of the “gridification” process of the opencluster; the 10 Gbps challenge where very high transfer rates were achieved over LAN and WAN distances; the organization of three thematic workshops including one on Total Cost of Ownership; the implementation of the openlab student programme, bringing some 11 students to CERN in the summer.
Other areas where IT collaborated with industry in 2003 include:
In the field of Application Software:
- Collaboration with Autodesk Inc., SUN Microsystems Inc.,
In the field of Internet Services and System Management
- Collaboration with Microsoft Research
In the field of Databases
- Collaboration with Oracle Corporation
-
The IT Department hosted at CERN two meetings of the First Tuesday Suisse Romande series, which organize regular events involving hundreds of local companies and institutions in the ICT field.
IT
organizes every year the CERN School of Computing (CSC). The 26th
CSC took place at the
The programme of the School was organized around three themes: Algorithms, Grid Technologies and Software Technologies and consisted of 30 hours of lectures and 22 hours of hands-on exercises, delivered by 12 lecturers from seven different organizations.
The
practical exercises required a substantial computing infrastructure. A Grid server system was installed by CERN and
the Institut für Hochenergiephysik (HEPHY),
68 students attended. The students were of 25 different nationalities (a new record for CSCs) from 39 different Institutes. 73% of them were citizens of a CERN member state, and 77% of them said their work was related to Particle Physics.
Attendance rate was very high - above 95% on average - including at optional lectures, and was sustained until the end. The satisfaction questionnaire was, for the first time, fully electronic, and filled out by 46 students. The overall appraisal score, 3.58 (very poor = 0, excellent = 4), was one of the highest in the history of the school.
For the second year running, an examination was offered at the end of school. 60 students registered for the exam and 53 passed. The examination was implemented in the form of computer-based multiple-choice questions. Each successful candidate received a formal credit certificate from CERN.
The major organizational novelty was the systematic use of web-based interfaces for all interactions. A live web site (http://cern.ch/CSC/2003/Live_from_CSC2003/CSC_live.htm) became the main vehicle for communication, with and between the students.
In 2003, a proposal was made to the European Commission FP6 Marie Curie programme for grants to assist up to 25% of the students with living and travel allowances over four years. The proposal was accepted with a high mark (93.5 / 100). The contract was signed at the end of 2003. Appendix 8 provides a list of facts and figures on the CERN School of Computing 2003.
The IT department (via the EDG and EGEE projects) was also
one of the founding members and is still a major contributor to the
In July 2002, IT Department developed a proposal for CERN to organize a conference in 2003 on the Role of Science in the Information Society (RSIS), in parallel to the World Summit on the Information Society. The proposal was accepted and IT contributed to the conference itself and led a complementary event in the form of an exhibition called the Science and Information Forum (SIS-forum).
IT was the originator of the RSIS conference held at CERN in December 2003. The IT contribution included the responsibility for organizing the project into work packages, the creation of working web sites and the provision of computing facilities for attendees during the conference. IT was also in charge of the “Enabling Technologies” morning, a session which was part of the scientific programme.
In addition IT was responsible for the design and implementation of the SIS-forum, an exhibition organized at Palexpo in the framework of the World Summit on Information Society (WSIS). The Programme committees and the Organizing committee included members from four divisions (ETT, EP, IT, HR); within IT, members of the CS, DB, DI, IS and US groups contributed. After a Call for Content, 42 projects from 32 organizations world-wide were selected and invited to present their activities on the stand.
The culminating event was the inauguration in the presence of Mr. Kofi Annan. The overall WSIS exhibition received about 38,000 visits. The SIS-forum site (http://cern.ch/sis-forum) received more than half a million visits during the month following the event.
More information on the SIS-forum is available in Appendix 9.
A survey of external collaborative activities in the Department was undertaken in 2003. The major outcome was the creation of a taxonomy of collaboration forms, as well as an inventory of those activities classified according to the taxonomy.
The taxonomy first classifies collaborations according to their nature:
o Formal collaboration
o
Informal
collaboration.
It
further splits them according to their type:
For
formal collaboration
·
Collaboration
via Public Funding (i.e. public funding institutions)
·
Collaboration
with Industry
·
Collaboration
with Public Institutions
·
Collaboration
via Open-Source -type Software
·
Collaboration
via Binary-type Software
·
Collaboration
via License-Agreement Software
For
informal collaboration
·
Collaboration
with HEP organizations
·
Collaboration
with Public Institutions
· Collaboration with Industry.
Appendix 10 provides details on the taxonomy
The survey covered five groups in 2003 (ADC, DB, IS, PS and DI). Results are available in Appendix 11.
A web site dedicated to Technology Transfer in the IT Department was created in 2003. It is intended to inform and create awareness on TT within IT, but also to inform readers within and outside CERN of TT activities in the Department.
Link: http://cern.ch/it-div-tt
“The
Director-General appoints the Technology Advisory Board (TAB). Its membership includes senior experts from
the Laboratory in areas such as: computing, cryogenics, electronics, magnets,
material technology, sensors, vacuum, etc. Ex officio members include: the
Director in charge of Technology Transfer, the Head of the ETT Division, the
CERN - EU link person, a member of the Legal Service and a member of the
Purchasing Service and appropriate staff from the TT Services. In addition, a few senior, external experts
are invited by the Director-General in order to contribute to the advice given
by the TAB.
The
Chairman of TAB is appointed by the Director General from among the members..”
CERN TAB member |
|
CERN TAB member / Divisional Technology Transfer Officer (AB) |
|
TT Service: TAB member (Secretary) |
|
CERN TAB member / Divisional Technology Transfer Officer (IT) |
|
CERN Tab Member / Divisional Technology Transfer Officer (EP) |
|
Ex Officio TAB member |
|
Ex Officio TAB member |
|
External TAB member, External Transfer Technology contact for |
|
TT Service: TAB member (Leader of the TT Service group) |
|
External TAB member |
|
Ex Officio TAB member |
|
Ex Officio TAB member, Divisional Technology Transfer Officer (SPL) |
|
CERN TAB member |
|
The Chairman of TAB |
|
CERN TAB member |
From TAB document,
The
Divisional TT Officer (DTTO) is nominated by, and reports to, his/her Division
Leader.
The
DTTO is the focal point for TT matters within his/her Division, and the liaison
between the Division and the TT Group.
The DTTO
would, for the Division:
In general:
·
Keep an
updated account of the Division’s scientific and technical assets;
·
Promote
technologies with potential for TT actions at the earliest possible stage;
·
Raise awareness within the
Division of the possibilities of integrated & collaborative projects, with
other institutions & industry;
·
Participate in
the TT Internal Network.
With regard to
the TT Workflow in particular:
·
Act as the
main point of contact for inventors within the Division, from the very
beginning of the file;
·
Advise inventors
on the initial steps that need to be taken in protecting IP and establish
contacts with the TT Group;
·
Call for the
formation of a Project team for the IP;
·
Inform the
Divisional hierarchy, at the appropriate time, of potential TT actions.
·
In relation to
the TT Group
·
Be the first
point of contact for its Division for action and implementation of the TT
policy;
·
Maintain
regular contact with the TT Group, and have good knowledge of TT practices
& procedures;
·
Act as the regular
provider of information and updates thereto on the Division’s technical assets
for the TT database;
·
Act, together
with the TT Group, as a channel for opportunities announced via the TT External
Network for requests from the Member States for contacts concerning specific
CERN technologies.
Constructed from TAB document presented at TAB
Meeting,
Intellectual Property (IP) |
Intellectual Property (IP) is a general
name for property which is the product of invention or creativity, and which
does not exist in a tangible, physical form’ (Oxford English Dictionary). As such it can be opposed to material
property such as buildings, machines etc. Both kinds of property are assets of the
Organisation |
‘Author of IP’ |
The term ‘author of IP’ shall designate the person having generated,
developed or invented IP. Such IP can
come in the form of know-how, software, designs, patentable IP and so on |
“Inventor” |
The term ‘Inventor’ designates at CERN the
author of a patented CERN Technology. |
Copyright |
A
‘Copyright’ (©) is a legal
protection covering literary works (e.g. publications), artistic works,
technical drawings, plans, photography audio-visual creations and software. It does not protect an idea itself but
rather the way the idea is expressed. Copyright comes into force automatically as a
creation takes place (although it is advised to make explicit reference to it
where applicable as soon as possible). It gives the author the right to control in
particular the copying, reproduction and sale of the protected works. |
‘Technology’ |
The term ‘Technology’ is used in it is very
widest sense, encompassing all IP |
‘Inventor’ |
The
term ‘Inventor’ shall designate
the author of a patented Technology. |
‘Invention’ |
The term ‘Invention’ designates a product or a
process that provides a new way of doing something, or offers a new technical
solution to a problem |
Patent |
A ‘Patent’ is a legal title granting
its holder the exclusive right to produce, use, offer, import or export a new
technical solution in the area covered by the patent thus stopping others
from doing so without authorisation of the holder. Confidentiality is an important pre-requisite
for patentability. The disclosure
(even oral) of a Technology may prevent it from being patented because the
essential criterion of novelty may no longer be considered fulfilled. |
‘Know-how’ |
‘Know-how’ covers all technical information, which is or cannot be
patented (but may include that information necessary for obtaining a patented
product or for carrying out the patented process). It may cover the details of a manufacturing
process, which although not inventive, are essential for a commercial product
to be obtained |
License |
A ‘License’ is an agreement which sets out the conditions under
which the owner of a Technology gives permission to another party to use it |
Trademark |
A ‘Trademark’ is a legal protection
covering the manner in which goods and services are identified and
recognised. Its purpose is to
distinguish goods from one company from those of another. CERN may consider applying for a trademark
where the same would provide publicity for, or make a statement as to, the
work carried out on its site (for example CERN’s trademark: ‘CERN – Where the
World Wide Web was born’.) It is possible
to register a word, a logo, or indeed any other mark, which can be described
or shown on a trademark application form. |
Non-Disclosure
Agreement (NDA) |
A ‘Non-Disclosure Agreement’ (NDA) is an agreement setting out the
terms under which two parties will exchange information which they deem
confidential. By signing the NDA a
party or both parties oblige(s) himself (themselves) not to disclose such information
to any third parties |
Source |
License
name |
|
Universities Academia |
MIT |
MIT License |
|
BSD License |
|
Industry |
SUN |
Sun Public License |
IBM |
IBM Public
License ( |
|
AOL |
Mozilla Public License (MPL) |
|
Trolltech |
Qt Public License (QPL) |
|
Not-for-profit organizations |
Free Software Foundation |
GPL LGPL |
Software name |
Form |
Mode |
License |
Printing Package
(Cient) |
Binary-only |
Publicly available |
Specific license |
Source (1) |
Bilateral Agreement |
Specific license: CIEMAT |
|
NICE 2000 |
Source (1) |
Bilateral Agreement |
Specific license ISO Friedrich Miescher Institute |
CERN Print Server
Software |
Source (1) |
Publicly available (Open source) |
GPL |
CASTOR |
Source (1) |
Publicly available (Open source) |
GPL |
SLIC |
Source (1) |
Publicly available (Open source) |
GPL |
EDG |
Source (1) |
Publicly available (Open source) |
Specific license (close to BSD) |
(1) In general, binary programmes are also made
available for selected environments in addition to source
All organizations having downloaded the Client Side Printing Package since 1999.
|
Organization |
City |
Country |
1
|
Abaco |
|
|
2
|
ABC
Computing |
|
|
3
|
ACS |
|
|
4
|
Alectryon
AG |
|
|
5
|
Allied
Services |
Clarks
|
|
6
|
Also
Comsyt S.A |
Renens |
|
7
|
Argus
Group |
|
|
8
|
ATS |
|
|
9
|
AUTH |
|
|
10
|
Barbara
Silver-Smith Attorney at Law |
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
Bayer |
|
|
13
|
BNL |
|
|
14
|
Boeing |
|
|
15
|
Box
Hill Institute |
Box
Hill |
|
16
|
Brookhaven
National Laboratory - BNL |
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
Caltech |
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
20
|
CCI |
Mamaroenck |
|
21
|
CCIP |
|
|
22
|
CCPM |
Marseille |
|
23
|
CEA |
Gif
sur Yvette |
|
24
|
CIEMAT |
|
|
25
|
CIT |
Woodbury |
|
26
|
CNRS-IN2P3 |
Annecy-le-Vieux |
|
27
|
Compaq |
|
|
28
|
Concepta
Consulting GmbH |
|
|
29
|
Corporate
Montage |
|
|
30
|
Cosworth
Racing Ltd |
|
|
31
|
CPPM |
Marseille |
|
32
|
CRM
Tech |
|
|
33
|
CSC/Sytex
Access |
|
|
34
|
CUE |
|
|
35
|
Dalsoft |
|
|
36
|
Data
Recoverylink |
|
|
37
|
DOKIT |
Herning |
|
38
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
41
|
DVPRINT |
|
|
42
|
EDS
|
|
|
43
|
Ernst
& Young AG |
|
|
44
|
ETHZ |
|
|
45
|
Experimental
Physics Inst. |
Gyongyos |
|
46
|
Expert-IT
Limited |
|
|
47
|
FBG
Services Corp. |
|
|
48
|
FCUL |
Lisboa |
|
49
|
Fermi
National Laboratory - FNAL |
|
|
50
|
Feusi
+ Partner AG |
Pfäffikon |
|
51
|
FIAT |
Betim |
|
52
|
|
|
|
53
|
FPNT |
|
|
54
|
FRSB |
|
|
55
|
Gemeente
Tilburg |
|
|
56
|
Genesis |
Hsinchu |
|
57
|
Helsinki
Institute of Physics |
|
|
58
|
HEPHY |
|
|
59
|
HiB |
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
61
|
Home
Care |
Schoolcraft |
|
62
|
HP |
Hancock |
|
63
|
IFAE |
Bellaterra |
|
64
|
IFCA |
|
|
65
|
IFIC |
|
|
66
|
IHEP |
|
|
67
|
IHEP |
Protvino |
|
68
|
IMDB,
Inc. |
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
70
|
IN2P3
- CCPM |
|
|
71
|
IN2P3
- IReS |
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
73
|
INFN
- |
|
|
74
|
INFN
- |
|
|
75
|
INFN
- |
|
|
76
|
INFN
- CNAF |
|
|
77
|
INFN
- |
Castrolibero |
|
78
|
INFN - Genova |
Genova |
|
79
|
INFN - Legnaro |
Legnaro |
|
80
|
INFN
- LNF |
Frascati |
|
81
|
INFN
- |
|
|
82
|
INFN
- Padova |
Padova |
|
83
|
INFN
- |
San
Piero a Grado |
|
84
|
INFN
- Roma |
|
|
85
|
InfOmar |
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
87
|
ITShastra
India Pvt. Ltd |
- |
|
88
|
Joint
Institute for Nuclear Research -JINR |
Dubna |
|
89
|
K.U.
Leuven |
|
|
90
|
Kaleida
Health |
|
|
91
|
KASB |
|
|
92
|
KEK |
Tsukuba |
|
93
|
Kinetics |
|
|
94
|
Kinko's,
Inc. |
|
|
95
|
Klinikum
Ingolstadt |
|
|
96
|
LAL |
Orsay |
|
97
|
|
|
|
98
|
LAPP |
Annecy-le-vieux |
|
99
|
LAUSD |
|
|
100
|
LBNL |
|
|
101
|
LK
Steiermark |
|
|
102
|
lMSS |
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
104
|
Minolta
|
Rødovre |
|
105
|
Morrison
Hershfield |
|
|
106
|
Motorola |
|
|
107
|
MPI
for Physics |
|
|
108
|
MWCOG |
|
|
109
|
National
Centre for Physics |
|
|
110
|
New.Media.Options |
|
|
111
|
NIOZ |
Den
Hoorn |
|
112
|
Northeastern
University |
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
114
|
Observatoire
de Geneve |
|
|
115
|
OCE
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
117
|
PCI |
|
|
118
|
PetroSA |
Mosselbay |
|
119
|
PNPI |
|
|
120
|
Pomeroy |
|
|
121
|
PSI |
Villigen |
|
122
|
PTFI |
Kuala
Kencana |
|
123
|
|
|
|
124
|
PWC |
Mumbai |
|
125
|
Realm
Technologies |
|
|
126
|
Rechenzentrum
der TU Braunschweig |
Braunschweig |
|
127
|
Royal
Hospitals |
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
129
|
Rutherford
Appleton Lab. |
Didcot |
|
130
|
Schneider
Ingenieure AG |
Chur |
|
131
|
SID |
|
|
132
|
Siemens
AG |
|
|
133
|
SKYCITY
|
|
|
134
|
SNS |
|
|
135
|
Stadt
Frankfurt |
|
|
136
|
Stony
Brook |
Stony
Brook |
|
137
|
Sun
Microsystems |
|
|
138
|
Sunnyside
Unified School |
|
|
139
|
Suomen
HyväMieli |
Kerava |
|
140
|
Télédiffusion
de France - TDF |
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
142
|
The
Center for High Energy Physics |
Daegu |
|
143
|
The
|
Anerley |
|
144
|
The Hong Kong Inst. of Education - HKIEd |
|
|
145
|
Tu-München |
Garching |
|
146
|
UCLA |
|
|
147
|
ULB |
|
|
148
|
|
Louvain-la-Neuve |
|
149
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Higashi-Hiroshima |
|
164
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Milano |
|
172
|
|
Twin
Cities |
|
173
|
|
Muenster |
|
174
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Bunkyo |
|
182
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
189
|
UOI |
|
|
190
|
Walter
Mäder AG |
Killwangen |
|
191
|
Ward
Computers |
Forstone |
|
192
|
|
|
|
193
|
WL
Technologies, Inc |
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
195
|
Zadco |
|
|
New downloads in 2003
|
WL
Technologies, Inc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDS
|
|
|
|
Genesis |
Hsinchu |
|
|
Home
Care |
Schoolcraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFIC |
|
|
|
CIT |
Woodbury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stadt
Frankfurt |
|
|
|
Dalsoft |
|
|
|
Joint
Institute for Nuclear Research -JINR |
Dubna |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louvain-la-Neuve |
|
|
IMDB,
Inc. |
|
|
|
Schneider
Ingenieure AG |
Chur |
|
|
|
Muenster |
|
|
CPPM |
Marseille |
|
|
INFN - Genova |
Genova |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Montage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INFN
- |
|
|
|
SNS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feusi
+ Partner AG |
Pfäffikon |
|
|
PetroSA |
Mosselbay |
|
|
Abaco |
|
|
|
CCIP |
|
|
|
FRSB |
|
|
|
Realm
Technologies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ward
Computers |
Forstone |
|
|
Kinetics |
|
|
|
New.Media.Options |
|
|
|
ABC
Computing |
|
|
|
INFN
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National
Centre for Physics |
|
|
|
Bayer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Center for High Energy Physics |
Daegu |
|
|
BNL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HiB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAPP |
Annecy-le-vieux |
|
|
LK
Steiermark |
|
|
|
Experimental
Physics Inst. |
Gyongyos |
|
|
Allied
Services |
Clarks
|
|
|
DVPRINT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INFN
- Roma |
|
|
|
The Hong Kong Inst. of Education - HKIEd |
|
|
|
INFN
- |
Castrolibero |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNPI |
|
|
|
CSC/Sytex
Access |
|
|
|
SKYCITY
|
|
|
|
ETHZ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ULB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEPHY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
People's Republic
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CERN as
"Home institute" |
20% |
Citizen
from a |
73% |
Work
related to particle physics |
77% |
Using
the facilities of CERN |
61% |
In data
processing methods for particle physics |
50% |
In
triggering and DAQ for particle physics |
39% |
Topical answers
Language difficulties during the
lectures? Yes |
7% |
Attend to evening lectures? Yes |
98% |
Enough time left for individual study Yes |
57% |
Programme of the School too heavy? Yes |
9% |
Scientific programme correctly balanced? Yes |
79% |
Too much emphasis on one or more topics? Yes |
42% |
Overall programme well balanced between Yes Lectures, discussion, study and
free time? |
84% |
Recreational facilities adequate? Yes |
93% |
Place appropriate to hold the School? Yes |
95% |
Overall satisfaction
Very Poor |
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Excellent |
0 |
0 |
0 |
41% |
59% |
The Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and the Global Knowledge Partnership organized in Palexpo, during the World Summit on Information Society (WSIS), an exhibition and a series of events collectively called the ICT for Development platform (ICT4D). In this context, they approached CERN in May 2003, offering free floor space to show CERN and more generally scientific projects and achievements which contribute to the information society. CERN accepted the offer and developed a concept called the Science and Information Society Forum (SIS-forum), also known as the Science Tree.
Neither totally an exhibition nor totally a conference, the SIS-forum capitalized on the conference concept, by inviting projects through a peer-review process, as well as on the principle of exhibitions, where presenters were available during time slots to respond to visitors’ questions.
As a result of a call for content issued in July, 42 projects from 32 organizations world-wide were invited, all focusing on science’s leading role in driving the development of the information society. They were organized into five themes: Education and Culture; Health; Development, Environment, Risks; Fundamental Sciences and Enabling Technologies; CERN in the Information Society. Presentations and demonstrations of projects were done exclusively in digital format, using a computer infrastructure set up by CERN, formed of 12 computers and 14 screens. The stand represented metaphorically a tree, formed of a trunk - central pillar where CERN achievements were shown - and branches –thematic pillars to host presentations on the four other themes. One tangible outcome of the project was the digitization of hours of existing analog CERN films to create a digital programme now available for further use.
The key messages explicitly conveyed were: “Science is collaborative and transcends borders”, “Scientific communities can be the vector for IS deployment is developing regions”; “CERN is playing a central role in the development of the information society”.
In total 32 people from four divisions (ETT, IT, HR, HR) as well as four persons from outside CERN contributed to the project.
The SIS-forum
was designated by the local press as one of the four best stands of the
exhibition. It attracted interest from
the press and media, leading to numerous articles and interviews including by
the BBC, the national Portuguese and Irish televisions. The inauguration in the presence of Mr. Kofi
Annan was a major media event. The stand
also received visits from numerous VIPs including the Presidents of Romania,
The major difficulty lay in the extremely short period of time, due to the late proposal by the Swiss government. The project was organized and developed is such a way that its entire machinery (structure, people) can be re-activated for further instantiations of the SIS-forum. The physical stand has been acquired by CERN and can be remounted. Two outside organizations expressed interest in hosting the SIS-forum – scientific content and its physical tree - at the occasion of major conferences. The CERN Globe of Innovation is also considering hosting it at the occasion of the 50th Anniversary.
The SIS-forum
was complemented by an on-line stand, where live demonstrations took place, in
particular over a fast connection to
To conduct the 2003 review of External Collaboration in the department, the following taxonomy was used.
Nature of Collaboration |
Type of collaboration |
||
Formal collaboration |
F |
Collaboration via Public Funding (i.e.
public funding institutions) |
FU |
Collaboration with Public Institutions |
PU |
||
Collaboration with Industry |
IN |
||
Collaboration via Open-Source -type Software |
OS |
||
Collaboration via Binary-type Software |
BS |
||
Collaboration via License-Agreement Software |
LS |
||
Informal collaboration |
I |
Collaboration with HEP organizations |
HE |
Collaboration with Public Institutions |
PU |
||
Collaboration with Industry |
IN |
Divisional Activities involving External Collaborations with Public Institutions. The inventory done in 2003 covered five groups only. It will be completed in 2004 with the other groups.
Type (1) |
Technology Domain
(2) |
Activity
Name |
Description |
Formal
agreement (4) |
External Org. |
Comment |
F-HE |
Application
Software |
INTAS
Collaboration |
Collaboration with Russian HEP
institutes on SW development and support |
3 years agreement |
Russian
institutes |
Framework agreement. Topics of
interest include Grid Middleware, Fabric management |
F-HE |
General |
Collaboration
framework with |
Collaboration with Bulgarian HEP
institutes for training |
3 years agreement |
Bulgarian
institutes |
Framework agreement |
F-OS |
Storage
Technologies |
CASTOR Software
package |
Software package developed by IT
division for the management of storage systems |
Software
available under the GPL License |
NA |
Software available from CERN servers
on an open-source spirit. |
F-PU |
Application
Software |
Collaboration
framework with |
Collaboration with Indian IT
institutes on Application Software |
|
Indian institutes |
Framework agreement |
F-PU |
Data
Bases |
Pool |
Pool of persistent objects for LHC |
|
Institute of
Advanced Technology |
Collaboration on Pool part of the
Indian contribution to the LHC |
F-BS |
Internet Services |
CERN Printing
Package |
Software developed by IT division to
administrate printers in a local windows environment |
Specific license
and copyright statement |
See list |
Software downloadable from CERN
server. A list of organizations having
downloaded is maintained |
F-LS |
Internet Services |
CERN Printing
Package |
Software developed by IT division to
administrate printers in a local windows environment |
License
Agreement K804/IT |
CIEMAT |
Source Software is made available
under bi-lateral license agreements |
F-LS |
Internet Services |
"Nice
2000" |
CERN Windows Infrastructure Management Software |
License
Agreement K805/IT |
ISO |
Source Software is made available
under bi-lateral license agreements |
F-LS |
Internet Services |
"PC-based
distributed Computing (NICE)" |
CERN Windows Infrastructure Management Software |
Cooperation
Agreement Renewed |
JINR Dubna |
|
F-HE |
Internet Services |
VRVS |
VRVS video-conferencing service |
Agreement between
Caltech-CERN |
CALTECH |
Collaboration for the joint
development and operation of the VRVS system |
F-PU |
Application
Software |
CAD Tools under
windows |
Collaboration on CAD tools under
Windows |
Cooperation
Agreement |
JINR Dubna |
|
F-PU |
Application
Software |
CAD2000 |
Collaboration on CAD2000 leading to
a CATIA pilot |
Cooperation
Agreement |
JINR Dubna |
|
F-HE |
Application
Software |
Browser for electronic |
Development of browser for
electronic components |
Cooperation
agreement |
IN2P3 |
EST division involved |
I-HE |
Application
Software |
Workshops on large clusters |
Collaboration with FermiLab on
sponsoring workshops and seminars on building large clusters |
NA |
Fermi National
Laboratory |
|
F-EU |
GRID Middleware Storage Technologies |
EDG: European DataGrid
|
European Union funded project |
EU Contract |
EDG partners |
Completion |
F-EU |
GRID |
EGEE |
European Union funded project |
EU Contract |
EGEE partners |
Project start: |
F-OS |
GRID Middleware |
EDG Middleware |
Software developed in the framework
on the EDG project |
Software
available under specific license |
NA |
Software available under CERN
specific open source license |
F-PU |
- Storage Technologies - Security |
CASPUR
Collaboration |
Wide range collaboration on storage,
computer security, public domain software |
Collab. Agreement |
CASPUR |
|
(1) Nature
of collaboration - Type of collaboration:
Nature:
F Formal collaboration
I Informal collaboration
Type
of Formal Collaborations
EU Collaboration via European Union (EU) funded projects
PU Collaboration
with PUblic Institutions
IN Collaboration with INdustry
OS Collaboration via Open Source-type Software
BS Collaboration via Binary-type Software
` LS Collaboration via License-Agreement Software
Type
of Informal Collaborations
HE Collaboration with HEP organizations
PU Collaboration with PUblic Institutions
IN Collaboration with INdustry
(2) Technology Domain
Application
Software
Computer
Architecture
Computer
Security
Data
Bases
GRID
Middleware
Internet
Services
Networking
Operating
systems and compilers
Software
Engineering
System
Management
Storage
Technologies
(3) Status:
P Potential
O On-going
C Closed
(4) Type
of formal agreement: License Agreement, Collaboration Agreement, Contract, …